Home - Category: Spirituality and Being (Page 2)

Category: Spirituality and Being

Science and Anti-Science on Depression

Posted on February 16, 2011 in Depression Thinking

Up to the podium they boldly walk and claim the Nobel Prize for themselves based on the same sort of reasoning that leads Creationists to dispute the Theory of Evolution. It amounts to “Science is not certain, so we have won the argument because we ~are~ certain.”

Cheap Love

Posted on January 4, 2011 in Agnosticism Morals & Ethics

square670As an agnostic, I can allow myself to trolley back and forth between atheist and religious thinkers. I’ve been reading a biography of [amazonify]1595551387::text::::Dietrich Bonhoeffer[/amazonify], paying special attention to the notion of “cheap” versus “costly” grace.

Just as in the years before Hitler’s rise, we see a lot of cheap grace in our Christian community. All you have to do is say “Jesus has saved me” and you can go on being the same person you always were. You can continue to be selfish; vote for right-wing candidates; hate women and minorities of all stripes; and generally live a life against the principles of Christ because God loves everyone and it doesn’t matter what you do. You bought a Bible, said you were saved, and so you are.

Costly grace is based on the Epistle of James where it is said that it is your works that count the most. You won’t worship the rich as the epitomes of Christian life in the world, you won’t turn your back on the poor and the sick, you won’t twist the words of and declaim against those attempting to build a compassionate society. Costly grace entails sacrifices including being less than wealthy, being seen as unheroic by a society obsessed with violence, and working in your spare time to help others.

I think a fine example of cheap grace is the line “I don’t like what {group x} does, but I still love them.” Yes, just sit back in your easy chair and insist on your love. It’s easy to come by: you just say that it is so. But how many people in America “love” the poor and then vote for politicians who raise taxes on the underclass and solve their health problems by incarcerating them? How many people say that because of their Bible they can’t allow homosexuals to marry, but they still “love” them?

The Bible tells us to do many things, but Biblidolators love to overlook the stuff that it downright vile and barbaric when it comes to their own lives and impose the worst on others. How many of them apply the repeated Biblical mandates against greed to their own lives? I think one of the functions of the űber-rich for middle class Americans is to give themselves the feeling that they are poor — even though by the standards of most of the rest of the world they are wallowing in specie. “Blessed are us,” they say and “blessed are those who allow a little to trickle down to us.” The rich are, to us, idols.

But cheap grace and the cheap love that comes from it allows them to say “I’m on my path, so I can be forgiven for what I do. I’ll get into heaven without any effort on the greed front.” So they go on despising the poor, Muslims, homosexuals, women confident that no matter how egregious and unChristian the spirit of their actions, they can just call it love and be forgiven.

God help them if there is a God. God help the rest of us whether or not there is one.

Goy on the Wall

Posted on July 20, 2010 in Morals & Ethics Travels - So Cal

square685Last week, I attended a film festival held in conjunction with a Jewish Genealogy conference at the L.A. Live Marriot. No, despite my eminently semitic name (Joel Sax), I am not Jewish. Lynn was there because she has long suspected that she has [[Sephardim]] ancestors from the vicinity of [[Constantinople]] or [[Thessaloniki]]. Wednesday was rich in workshops on the subject, so she paid for a one day conference pass and bought a film festival ticket for me.

I saw only four of the movies during the eight hours I was around. The only fictional piece was a short about a Hungarian Jewish mother in hiding who rescued the son of another Jew from a firing squad. The standard Holocaust theme done in black and white caught the heart. The contents of the next film were forgettable. After it, I ate lunch and took a walk down to the L.A. Public Library and back ((I was frustrated all the way because I did not have my Nikon to catch the street scenes. My d40 had died and I was waiting for a new d60 to replace it. What photos I did capture were taken with my Droid camera phone. Some interesting material resulted, but I was limited by my battery’s power.)) before the next two.

A film about [[Felix Mendelssohn]] and his descendants raised the question raised the question “Can there be anything especially Jewish about his music? I laughed aloud when I heard a Nazi claim that he lacked depth and soul. That his music could be considered “Jewish” caused one man to vocally argue against it. How can music be measured as Jewish or not, he cried. Music is music. The whole concept struck him as ludicrous.

There was also the question about the many German Jews who converted during the 19th Century. This had made no difference to the Nazis who rounded up Mendelssohn-Bathory family descendants wherever they could find them, but it also annoyed many Jews who saw this as treasonous and uncalled for.

The plight of South American [[Crypto-Jews]] also touched on this theme. To be a Jews in these times — especially in Catholic-dominated Latin America — invited discrimination, hatred, and even violence. The biggest hurdles for the handful of men and women who wanted to recover the religion of their ancestors, however, were not set in their path by Catholics but by Jewish survivors of the Holocaust who had come to South America to escape the ultimate pogrom. Whose Judaism was more authentic? asked the [[Reform_Judaism|Reform]] rabbi who performed the conversions: the ones who had been given it by birth and only perfunctorily lived a Jewish life or these who had embraced it with passion? The worst discrimination the new converts — who were the descendants of men and women who had lost their faith in the aftermath of the Inquisition — came from other Jews who did not want to recognize their conversions.

I didn’t stay for very long afterwards, but I made these observations. First, I found myself moved by the story largely because as one who had been raised a Christian, I accepted the idea of being drawn to a religion and affirming a connection to it by an act of faith. Second, though it annoyed me at the time, I have since come to realize the source of the hurt that led some in the audience to lash out at the aspersions of Kansas City based Rabbi Jacques Cukierkorn ((The film showed Rabbi Cukierkorn conducting a mikvah in an Ecuadorean river. The symbolism of this is so close to baptism that I can appreciate the audience’s nervousness.)) . “I’m only a Jew by birth”, one woman prefaced her attack during the question and answer period led by the filmmaker.

Every one of the Abrahamic religions — Judaism, Christianity, and Islam — experiences among its own controversies as to who is a member and who is not. Many of the Jews who the rabbi criticized spent all of their lives struggling to be good people by learning to read Hebrew, reading tracts on theology, and living the life of charity that the religion calls for. Are they less authentic because they have not undergone a conversion experience? It has been part of their lives all along. Yet I continue to feel compassion for those whose families were cut off by political matters, who are only now finding it safe to learn about the faith of their fathers and return to it. I don’t think racism is the word I would use to characterize the attitudes of those reared as Jews, but it has a similar effect in bringing down the person. You are damned because of the choices your ancestors made is the way some Jews interpret rabbinical law. There is no going back no matter how deep the longing, how appropriate and authentic the faith. I kept my mouth shut in the room, but I am opening it here. Like the other religions, some of the concepts driving traditional Judaism are just plain wrong and are in need of reform. Ties broken by centuries of persecution should be reforgeable.

So speaks a goy.

Top

Engage

Posted on July 4, 2010 in Encounters Folly Watch Thinking

The first person who asks me what I mean can go soak her/his head in a vat of near beer.

square679I’ve been told by the well-meaning that I “lack social skills”. This may be true, in the usual sense of the word, but I employ a different variety of social skill to get by. I play dumb around strangers and family I seldom see. Talking, you see, brings questions, and when questions come too quickly, the mind loses its place.

“What do you mean?” is probably the most vapid, unimaginative and aggressive question you can ask me. It’s the prelude for an attack for some, a perfunctory exercise for most who are like a dog given a cucumber: they haven’t any idea what they are supposed to be doing with it.

So I’m not a big talker when I am with people. I prefer to observe. When gazing upon things or otherwise experiencing the world, I do so with the minimal possible intrusion of language. The machine gun minds want you to do more than this. They want you to layer a hefty meaning on it all ((Ask them “What do you mean by meaning?” sometime. When they balk, insist that they define their terms because without a clear and detailed explanation, how are you going to be able to give them what they want?)) because they are uncomfortable with the perplexing lightness of the world.

If you want to enjoy the world with me, don’t look for shortcuts. If it is one of my pictures, examine it without asking me to say what it is. If it is my writing, remember that I take care to write what I mean — sometimes using metaphors. It’s a waste of my time and yours to step away from what is before you, to demand that I provide you with Cliff Notes for each and every one of my creative acts. Engage.

Top

Tired Pity

Posted on April 7, 2010 in Bipolar Disorder Morals & Ethics Sorrow & Regret Uncertainty

square647Every day, nearly, I meet a disturbed person, either online, in a support group, or, rarely, out in the world. The easiest, for me, are the hurt and disappointed by love: in their desperation the good in me can reach out and encourage them to pay no attention to the absence of affection in their life, to live life and know that they are likely to meet another. Harder are those who are suicidal, but not impossible. A good ear helps.

The worst for me are those whose lives are undeniably, completely screwed up either by an addiction which is killing them or codependency. It becomes clear that they are addicted to the drama in their lives — to the products of their highs and lows. Often these possess unacknowledged mood disorders. They will talk to you at length about the disaster that is their life. And you find that there is absolutely nothing you can say because being in the place you are — maybe a happy marriage, temporary financial security, a house free of dangerous family members or other violent residents — places you almost in affront. To these you listen and say nothing. They’re as difficult as the people who sometimes show up in a support group, whose manias spill over and flood the room.

I feel left only with only a tired pity. I suspect they hate me for it.

Top

Thoughts on an argument about the Big Question

Posted on July 28, 2009 in Agnosticism Hypocrites

square589The argument went like this: as an agnostic, I am “without belief in a God”. Therefore, I am an atheist. The trouble is that I am also without a disbelief in God. Those who know me observe that I will happily quote sacred texts as well as nonsacred texts when they have pragmatic application. But even this is missing the real point.

A [[Sufi]] holy woman named [[Rabia al-Adawiyya]] made it her habit to pray thusly: Dear God, if I love you because I don’t want to burn in hell, then I should burn in hell for all eternity. If I love you because I want to get into heaven, then I should be denied heaven.

For me, the whole question of whether there is a God or not interferes in my relationship with the Universe and my quest to be a good person. Both atheists and believers can get caught up in myth-wars with one another, the one claiming that the other is hypocritical or evil or just unable to do good, the other returning the favor. They often feel it highly necessary to engage in argument with those who do not see the world as they do. They call agnostics cowards for not taking a position.

I assure you that to publically refuse to answer the Big Question invites all kinds of abuse as it did last night ((After refusing to be defined into atheism, I was told that I was trying to tell atheists what atheism was all about! When I laughed this off, I was called a grumpy old man and a paranoid. Believers are no strangers to this, but they usually leave us agnostics alone.)) . I know that and I still preserve my focus on being a good person. I know both atheists and believers who are good people despite the protestations of the others. I have friends in both camps. My relationship with the Universe (the existence of which I am certain) and other people can be distorted by capitulating to camp cries for a decision on an issue which is unimportant. Identifying with either bivouac denies me the prize of serenity.

Top

Falling

Posted on March 17, 2009 in Class Journals & Notebooks Mania Spirituality and Being Writing Exercises

Mania is a long fall, sometimes so high it’s an orbit.

Top

Rick Warren

Posted on December 19, 2008 in Spirituality and Being Video


Rick Warren on 12seconds.tv

See my other 12 Seconds videos here.

Top

Mega Church Spectacle, Mega Vapidity

Posted on December 19, 2008 in Folly Watch Myths & Mysticism

Hail Great Diana of Ephesus — er — Jesus.

Top

Sarah Palin as Brain Surgeon

Posted on September 23, 2008 in Campaign 2008 Thinking

square478Sam Harris confronts Sarah Palin supporters’ insistance that what America needs in the presidency is an ordinary person:

What is so unnerving about the candidacy of Sarah Palin is the degree to which she represents—and her supporters celebrate—the joyful marriage of confidence and ignorance. Watching her deny to Gibson that she had ever harbored the slightest doubt about her readiness to take command of the world’s only superpower, one got the feeling that Palin would gladly assume any responsibility on earth:

“Governor Palin, are you ready at this moment to perform surgery on this child’s brain?”

“Of course, Charlie. I have several boys of my own, and I’m an avid hunter.”

“But governor, this is neurosurgery, and you have no training as a surgeon of any kind.”

“That’s just the point, Charlie. The American people want change in how we make medical decisions in this country. And when faced with a challenge, you cannot blink.”

The prospects of a Palin administration are far more frightening, in fact, than those of a Palin Institute for Pediatric Neurosurgery. Ask yourself: how has “elitism” become a bad word in American politics? There is simply no other walk of life in which extraordinary talent and rigorous training are denigrated. We want elite pilots to fly our planes, elite troops to undertake our most critical missions, elite athletes to represent us in competition and elite scientists to devote the most productive years of their lives to curing our diseases. And yet, when it comes time to vest people with even greater responsibilities, we consider it a virtue to shun any and all standards of excellence. When it comes to choosing the people whose thoughts and actions will decide the fates of millions, then we suddenly want someone just like us, someone fit to have a beer with, someone down-to-earth—in fact, almost anyone, provided that he or she doesn’t seem too intelligent or well educated.

I’m a little bothered that Newsweek put this under the headline “An Atheist Attacks” when all this represents is good common sense for the most part. There is no necessity to identify a critic’s religious persuasion or lack of it when the article does not dwell on religious issues but the greater ideals of reason. I sense a poison pill which will prevent many people from reading these words or, worse, an atheist who naively thinks that he will gain some converts by it.

Top

Agnostic Creed

Posted on March 9, 2008 in Agnosticism

Brian Kane has posted P.Z. Myer’s nicely worded Atheist Creed.

Still, same old problem that troubles all thinking along the theist/atheist rift: certainty.

My agnostic creed isn’t a creed at all, but just a simple statement of fact:

I don’t have the answers to ultimate questions and I can live without them.

[tags]Agnosticism, atheism, religion, spirituality[/tags]

Top

Forgiveness

Posted on February 19, 2008 in Agnosticism Attitudes Ettiquette

square444It has occurred to me, after much therapy and thought about the suggestions that my psychologist makes, that to forgive we must feel safe. That is why it is easy to forgive the dead (unless we are plagued by a belief in ghosts) — they are no longer around physically.

This puts into a new light the exhortation by people of faith to forgive: “Forgive because you are backed by a greater power than this tormentor of yours. They can only wreak physical harm on you. When it is over, there is still the Life Everlasting.” This makes it easy for those faced with the demons of daily life and who believe. But the problem is “Is this just a lie we tell ourselves?”

Forgiveness is a good thing, but to manifest broadly without religion we need to create new terms for safety.

Top
  • Recent Comments

  • Categories

  • Archives