Posted on August 28, 2011 in Roundup
Time destroys the speculation of men, but it confirms nature. Cicero
Posted on August 21, 2011 in Roundup
Posted on August 15, 2011 in Mania Psychotropics
The anti-medication crowd among us bipolars sounds off in a strident voice. Medications, they tell us, are little more than an attempt by the pharmaceuticals industry to enslave us. According to them, psychotropics kill us and prevent us from experiencing the full impact of our glorious emotions ((Fuck you, [[Thomas Szasz]].)) . Psychiatrists are predators who don’t know how to cure people, only get them addicted.
Sometimes, their arguments betray a certain loss of reality as does this gem from a comment by an anti-med proponent:
Consider for example: “Drugs Work” because “We Tried Drug X on patient Y” and “Effect Z happened in response to Drug X tried on patient Y” and “We Liked What We Saw” and “We Are The Sole Arbiters Of What We Like” therefore “We are Right” and “We Know What We Are Doing” and “Drug X has effect Z” and “People like patient Y need Drug X” and “We Can Supply Drug X” so “Patient Y should get Drug X from us on a perpetual basis” is not explicitly circular, but if you try to complete the logical dependencies, logical circularities will result or else the explanation will grow out of control. Any thoughts on this kind of thinking?
Did you follow that? Later, when the talk turns to statistics:
[C]onsider these: 100% of dead people who have taken medication have died. 0% of living people who have not taken medication have died. Living people who have been given medication may die, and almost certainly will. So, based on these statistics, should we be offering medication?
This writer thinks he has hit on a profundity. I think it illustrates the tragic loss of rationality that can afflict us in mania.
Posted on August 14, 2011 in Roundup
Absolute power does not corrupt absolutely, absolute power attracts the corruptible. — Frank Herbert
Memes. A couple of memes driving extremists caught my attention today. The first was suggested by the comment of a progressive who told an African American woman that she had to “get over being black”. The meme is that most African Americans have an unreasonable hair trigger about race and are only supporting Obama because he is black.
It’s an echo of a meme that the Republicans have been circulating for years, one that they apply until their black candidates get criticized for their positions. Then invoking racism becomes just fine as [[Alan West]], [[Clarence Thomas]], or [[Herman Cain]] will show you any day.
Another folk theory that I encountered this past week is “all politics is corrupt”. This dripped off the honeyed lips of a Tea Party minion. I’ve been hearing this one since Watergate and it is always Republicans who invoke it. The idea here is that if all politics is corrupt, then the Democrats do it, too, and we can’t fault them ((I don’t tolerate corruption from any politician regardless of party.)) .
There’s an insidious intent behind the meme and that is to block any attempts to reform the political process. A secondary aim is to treat corruption involving millions in donations from corporations or wealthy individuals as insignificant. “Ah, politics is always corrupt. Live with it.”
We must resist such memes. First, we must recognize that we are a long way from a post-racial age — just look in the prisons and in the unemployment figures ((For that matter, we’re hardly in a post-feminist age. We need to struggle for equality just as surely now as ever.)) Second, we must never let anyone tell us to give up — that we can’t do better than we are. Finally, let’s not knock down the good that has been accomplished because we’re told it’s just hopeless. It is time to tell the GOP that you can’t be a party of morals that takes paybacks. When you sell out to the rich, you are contributing to a national rot. Stop it now.
Posted on August 7, 2011 in Roundup
A despot doesn’t fear eloquent writers preaching freedom–he fears a drunken poet who may crack a joke that will take hold. — E. B. White
No AAA for Effort. The final news about what S&P will rate U.S. bonds is still waiting on its number crunchers to correct their accounting error that the Obama administration found late on Friday. (S&P seems to be off by a couple of trillion dollars.) In the meantime, we have another financial crisis brought on by the Republicans. As usual, a paucity of responses dominates the discussion on the anti-Obama side. Their primary talking point is the solo, monolithic “blame it all on Obama”.
The S&P report explaining the decision to lower the rating on U.S. bonds is clear: the problem is our lack of revenue coupled with the late proclivity of our Congress towards “brinksmanship”. Extrapolating from this enables us to level the finger at the party whose philosophy encompasses both of those: Republican ((Blue Dog Democrats have done their share on the revenue side, but the theatrics belong exclusively to the Tea Party-driven GOP)) .
Nonetheless, Obama-bashers of both sides obstinately get the story wrong. One of the most creative and wrong was that of a cowboy-hatted Tea Bagger who told me “read the damn document”. I did. And it said what I said it said, Mister.
Of course, this was never meant for me. It was meant for his fellow Tea Baggers and those who will never read the document for themselves. It suggests esoteric knowledge that absolves the Tea Party of all the wreckage they have caused in the last few months. Denial is the Tea Party way: ’tis better for these rabbits to call themselves coyotes so that maybe, just maybe, they will not be eaten by the wolves who back them.