Trolled

Posted on September 19, 2003 in Evolution & Creation Humor? The InterNet

They did a good job, I have to admit. And this trout was rolling the hook over his tongue, wondering if he was going to bite the bait of “Dr. Richard Paley” and the rest of his “team”. Good minds such as that of Robert Brady were drawn in by the seemingly sincere words that spoke out against Evolution and triclavianism:

Triclavianists hold that three, and only three, nails were used to affix our Lord Jesus Christ to the cross. While it might be true that three nails were used — and, in fact, archeological evidences uncovered by Biblical researchers positively point to this conclusion — it is erroneous, and theologically dangerous, to make this a doctrinal position. The Bible does not enumerate the Lord’s nails and any extra-Biblical research on the subject — while both interesting and useful for apologetic purposes when dealing with those afflicted with a Secular world view that denies even the historicity of our Lord’s passion and crucifixion — cannot be considered of any substantive import to the Faith.

The Bible is the infallible and inerrant word of God; everything that He wanted us to know about Faith can be found in its pages. If He remains silent on the issue of the number of nails used in the sacrifice of His only begotten Son, then it is not for us to presume to make it a point of contention. Those that do are like the Pharisees, hypocritical in their righteousness based on their own worldly learning, and they will lead people astray and away from the True teachings of God. Therefore, we must oppose their strident and irrelevant teachings on the triune nature of the implements of our Lord’s impalement.

The heresy in triclavianism is not the belief in the use of only three nails, per se. Rather, it is the insistence that fallible, non-Biblical sources of information should be used as a guide to important matters of Faith. Triclavianism is merely a pernicious symptom of a greater illness inflicting today’s Christians: the allowing of Secularists to subvert the authority of Christ’s teachings, thereby replacing Faith with scepticism and knowledge with ignorance. Those who do not oppose this illness strongly enough, although their motives may be pure, are only helping to spread it.

David Emery is among those that insist that this is a hoax. Robert Brady came to the conclusion that he’d been parodied. Respecting the intelligence of both men as I do, I disagree: this is a troll, a deliberate attempt to arouse ire by presenting an outrageous point of view. Sniff it. Observe the hook inside the cheese. They’re trying to reel you in and fry you up for dinner!


Maybe some Christians were caught, too. Or are they part of the troll?

  • Recent Comments

  • Categories

  • Archives