Home - Roundup - Insert a Trite Metaphor for a Corral #107

Insert a Trite Metaphor for a Corral #107

Posted on July 24, 2011 in Roundup

Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain, and most fools do. — Benjamin Franklin

square764Norquist and the Alienation of Congress. Who elects our representatives? Who do they represent? The Founding Fathers meant the questions to be simple ones. The answer is, of course, their constituents. But the influx of money into political campaigns and the rise of pressure groups has removed the focus of representatives from their districts.

[[Grover Norquist]] has been called the most powerful unelected politician in the country because he has persuaded 97% of the representatives in the House to sign a no tax increase pledge. The trouble that this has caused in the course of the debt ceiling talks has Americans furious with him. Trust fund baby Norquist can’t understand why they want to “pick on” the rich. Like many of his class, the difference between money you have earned yourself and money that was given to you by your parents is unclear to him. There’s a fear in the back of Norquist’s head, one that suggests that if he comes to live with the same resources as the average American family, his uniqueness and his power will disappear. Ordinariness would stifle him. He would become another voice ignored by Republican politicians because they lack money. As he would become in this nation growing more like the England of King George III than the Colonies.

But Norquist is the symptom. Congress has never been good about curbing the potency of lobbyists. Their dollars help them to keep their jobs, their fortunes, and their power. Recent Supreme Court decisions etched by Republican appointees — at least two of which have entertained conflicts of interest — have discounted the need to contain the corruption posed by campaign financing laws. Congress is up for sale and the buyers don’t want their taxes raised. So they press the politicians they own to sign Norquist’s pledge.

Marx spoke of the alienation of the worker from the product of his labor, the denial of profit to those who make with their hands the things that people buy. This concept has been adopted by right wing econobots as an aim. A similar trend can be observed in our democracy: the alienation of the voter from the product of her/his vote. Your representative is not beholden to you as much as s/he is beholden to the people who bought the seat for her/him.

So what can we do?

We still have power — power to reject the corporate choices being made in Congress by phrasing in a new way an old, unwritten standard. Instead of voting for those who make pledges to Norquist, Adam Green, MoveOn, or any other PAC, we should demand that the only pledges a Congressperson should make are to her/his constituents, that the only oath that matters is the oath of office. If we of the right, left, and center stick to this even when our own cherished issues are at stake, we will begin to see the end of the new corruption. Grover Norquist and others like him will have to take their balls and go home. Then we can pick up the vital game of constructing a nation once more.

Tweet: Terror and fear are not conscience: they are its antithesis.

“We will retaliate with more democracy” -Stoltenberg

  • Recent Comments

  • Categories

  • Archives