Home - 2004 - August (Page 2)

Month: August 2004

Two Sides of His Mouth

Posted on August 24, 2004 in Campaign 2004 Liberty Scoundrels

Bush’s remarks suggest that he’s out to quash the grassroots sentiment building against him.

Comments Problem

Posted on August 24, 2004 in Bugs

square200.gifI’m not sure what is causing this, but when people try to comment today, I get a page not found error. Reloading the page does post the comment, though you get another error. Has anyone else had this problem and do they know how to cure it?

Popdex

Posted on August 23, 2004 in Blogging Pointers

Join up today!

Top

Our Tercel: 1986 – 2004

Posted on August 23, 2004 in Driving Possessions

The two of us had put nearly 280,000 miles on the beast.

Top

Rage, Rage against the Denying of Your Rights

Posted on August 22, 2004 in Campaign 2004 Courage & Activism Medical Ethics

America is losing what it means to be America under this administration.

Top

Our Lady of Bikini

Posted on August 21, 2004 in Hatred Myths & Mysticism The Orange

“Our Lady ” is a provocative work of art which depicts Mary as she might appear to a Juan Diego today: in a flower-rimmed bikini.

Top

A Note on Comments

Posted on August 21, 2004 in Site News

square027.gifDue to my switchover to WordPress, I have elected to set my comments to moderated. (I am exploring plugins and hacks, also, this weekend.) For this reason, comments to the site will not appear immediately. I check several times each day, however, so please do not despair if you do not see them immediately.

If anyone knows a way to make a list of approved commentators, please let me know! I am also looking into setting up links for Amazon.com and where I am browsing as I have seen on some pages. Feel free to use the comments to tell me how to do the latter, especially.

Top

Politics in the Waiting Room

Posted on August 21, 2004 in Anxiety Medical Ethics

square197.gifI’m still reeling over the whole business of yesterday, the blatant propagandizing in the waiting room and the attitude of my doctors that it was okay for a physician to corrupt the patient-physician relationship with politics. I am angry and I am bitter about the whole affair. Can I trust the physician that Bristol Park assigned to me while my regular doctor is on sick leave? What do I do?

There’s not much on the net about the issue of doctors politicizing the practice, but I found a few links which spoke to experiences:

The last article brought tears to my eyes as I read it. Here is a gentleman who understands both sides of the issue. I am not asking any doctor to change his or her politics to suit me: just to keep it out of the medical office. This free country bullshit is trumped by reasonable expectations of neutrality in the medical office.

I am in tears and feeling anxious now because of this dimwit — evidentally one of those who got through medical school in those days when only grades mattered and the chief reason for entering the profession was to make a lot of money.

I do miss my regular physician and hope that his health improves so that he can return to practice. I went through several years of being scared of dentists because of a jerk. I don’t want to jeopardize my health again because of this.

So I am asking what can I do to protect myself?

From the Victoroff article:

When a professional advertises a political position with an emblem such as a button, it changes the terms of the professional relationship (teacher-student, doctor-patient, etc.). Such relationships are inherently unequal, because the “learned” party is held — rightfully — in a position of superior regard, at least in the subject matter concerned. So, the effect of a political button can vary.

If you don’t have a position on the issue the button addresses, your respect for the wearer might persuade you that its message is credible. This is the intent of slogans. They are not arguments, but telegraphic symbols of arguments that save recipients from having to think things out for themselves. On the other hand, if you oppose the button-on position, you might lose some respect for the wearer. Psychologists (and lawyers who get called in these cases) call this a “boundary violation.”

This occurs when a professional relationship becomes contaminated by material that is irrelevant or inappropriate. Examples are when your gym teacher invites you to the prom, or your psychiatrist asks you for a stock tip. These intrusions threaten the bubble of trust that makes professional relationships work.

Top

Mock Election

Posted on August 20, 2004 in Campaign 2004

square234.gifIs the election getting so awful that you want it over with today? Do you want to show, perhaps, how meaningless Internet polls are? The Mock Election allows you to throw in your two cents without a trip to the polls. It doesn’t even matter if you are a citizen!

Top

Getting Ugly

Posted on August 20, 2004 in Campaign 2004 Medical Ethics

I do not go to any health care provider for politics.

Top

Counter Revolution

Posted on August 20, 2004 in Folly Watch Myths & Mysticism Reading

square289.gifHarper’s editor Lewis Lapham writes an impressive history of the rise of the conservative ideological machine, from the time when, as a young editor, he was tempted to join their ranks as editor of The New Criterion to his growing disillusionment with the apparatchik lockstep of our present age. He writes:

How does one reconcile the demand for small government with the desire for an imperial army, apply the phrases “personal initiative” and “self-reliance” to corporation presidents utterly dependent on federal subsidies to the banking, communications, and weapons industries, square the talk of “civility” with the strong-arm methods of Kenneth Starr and Tom DeLay, match the warmhearted currencies of “conservative compassion” with the cold cruelty of “the unfettered free market,” know that human life must be saved from abortionists in Boston but not from cruise missiles in Baghdad? In the glut of paper I could find no unifying or fundamental principle except a certain belief that money was good for rich people and bad for poor people. It was the only point on which all the authorities agreed, and no matter where the words were coming from (a report on federal housing, an essay on payment of Social Security, articles on the sorrow of the slums or the wonder of the U.S. Navy) the authors invariably found the same abiding lesson in the tale — money ennobles rich people, making them strong as well as wise; money corrupts poor people, making them stupid as well as weak.

We can save America in only one way, I think, and that is by counter-revolution founded on Truth and dignity. This terrible mythology which confounds virtue with conspicuous consumption is the present undoing of this nation. The secret Spencerism which has destroyed the Commons with its fences of self-righteousness can only be undone by public discourse and affirmation of the value of people living with one another. “Public” is not a bad word. Nor is “compassion”. Let us insist that they form the basis of our life together.

Top

Who is Running for President

Posted on August 20, 2004 in Campaign 2004

Your choice isn’t limited to Bush or Kerry.

Top
  • Recent Comments

  • Categories

  • Archives