Home - 2006 - October (Page 5)

Month: October 2006

Still Deciding

Posted on October 6, 2006 in Humor?

Is it going to be anteaters (pangolins, echidnas included) or pumas, or coyotes?

Hook Bush Up

Posted on October 6, 2006 in Fact-Dropping

Scientists discover that magnetic pulses can curb selfishness. Mandate that Bush and Cheney be hooked up to one of these machines when making decisions that affect all of us?

Egotism

Posted on October 5, 2006 in Attitudes Imagination

I have to confess that the most interesting person I know is myself but only because I can see into my own mind and observe how it works.

Top

An Unseen Risk

Posted on October 5, 2006 in War

we could be on the verge of a coup.

Top

No Need to Rise to A Hitler

Posted on October 2, 2006 in Justice War

Clearly — despite the posturings of some Republican supporters — there is no ambition on the part of American forces or their leadership to annihilate the Iraqi people or the Muslim religion.

Top

Lucky Iceland

Posted on October 2, 2006 in Occupation of Iraq

They seem to be the one country which U.S. forces are actually leaving.

Top

Pay as You Smudge

Posted on October 2, 2006 in Security

It seems a cool idea to create a system where we can pay using our fingerprints but a recent Scientific American evaluation found the idea wanting:

As an authentication tool, fingerprints are great–police catch criminals with them, after all. But it is not foolproof: it’s possible to use fingerprint images–derived from gelatin or clay, for instance–to fool readers. Clarkson University researchers found that 90 percent of well-made fakes could pass for real ones. In July, ZDNet quoted a Deloitte and Touche analyst that biometric spoofing is a growing concern, especially considering that we leave fingerprints everywhere. In principle, crooks who know you use Pay By Touch could lift your prints from your cocktail glass, make a mold, and then go on a free shopping spree. Call it the six-finger discount.

I suppose you can make things harder by using an unlisted telephone number or even make up a seven-digit number (as if you need another data string to remember). You might also try using a pinky rather than an index finger, to add a bit of uncertainty. Algorithms that look for signs of life, like sweat or a pulse, might also foil the rubber finger.

But then there’s the germ factor: touching a panel that who-knows-how-many have previously touched. A paper presented today at the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy reported a study that found people with colds staying at hotels left the rhinovirus on surfaces they touched 35 percent of the time. Uninfected people picked up the virus on their fingertips 47 percent of the time, even 18 hours after the surface was contaminated. Scanners may be less filthy than hotel rooms, since the finger is on the reader only briefly, but I would not bet on that.

File this under the category of “people who love technology too much for their own good”.

Top

Dream

Posted on October 2, 2006 in Dreams

I am riding with my father when the car and all the lights in the neighborhood suddenly go out.

Top

Ceiling Fan and Presence

Posted on October 2, 2006 in Routine

I’ve only been slowly going back to read other blogs.

Top

You Vote

Posted on October 1, 2006 in Humor?

square079I’ve been seeing a lot of Squid blogging around. They throw in the occasional octopus and Cthulhu, but there’s too much a trend here for my comfort. So I am thinking of a Friday blogging which will open new fields of inquiry. The question is, which of these creatures should be my focus?

  • wombat
  • coati
  • pangolin
  • bat ray
  • barnacle
  • puma (would actually bear some relation to me)
  • quail (aka sage hen)
  • coyote (locally common)
  • elephant seal
  • write-in

So what is your choice?

Top

Sighted People and the Rest of Us

Posted on October 1, 2006 in Reflections

square078Can no one know Reality? Must we define it before we can know it? In Buddhism, we know Reality by silencing all talk about it and just observing it from a still place. So that leaves very few people (not including myself) who can see Reality for what it is. There is a large number of people who get pieces — the body parts salon of the Blind Men and the Elephant. This is the largest group. And in the final group are those who, for reasons of disease or sheer stubbornness, do not see more than a twig of Reality. The New Age can lead you here if you are not careful. Combine that with mental illness and you are lost, lost indeed.

Top

No Smilies on Snow Crystals

Posted on October 1, 2006 in Fact-Dropping Psycho-bunk Reading

This little vignette very nicely describes the nature of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. From Robert L. Park’s Voodoo Science, a fine compedium of “sane” delusions:

Suppose, for example, that you want to clock the speed of an automobile. You could set up two pylons on the side of the road a known distance apart. An observer at the first pylon will press a button that starts a clock running when the car passes; when the car passes pylon number two, a second observer will press a button stopping the clock. The accuracy of the measurement depends on such things as how precisely the pylons are positioned and how quickly observers respond. The effect of these uncertainties can be minimized by simply using a larger separation between the pylons.

But now suppose you also ask where the car was when its speed was measured. The answer is “between the pylons”. The more accurately you determine the automobile’s speed by moving the pylons apart, the less precise you can be about its position. If you want to be more precise about the position of the car, you must move the pylons closer together, making the speed measurement more uncertain.

This trade-off is the classic dilemna of the measurement. Position and motion are said to be “complementary” variables….

What Heisenberg postulated was that there is a fundamental limit on how accurately you can simultaneously know both the position and motion of a particle. That limit, called the Planck constant, is a measure of the graininess of nature.

So it has nothing to do with funny faces on ice crystals appearing when you sing happy songs to them. Tell that to your resident New Age Bipolar-Depression Denier.

Top
  • Recent Comments

  • Categories

  • Archives