Home - 2010

Year: 2010

Republican Christmas

Posted on December 19, 2010 in Class Compassion Scoundrels

If Christ was born among us today and they got wind of it, the Republicans would be at the manger to brand Him deny the validity of his birth certificate.

Glenn Beck’s Big Government Claims a Victim

Posted on December 16, 2010 in Equality Liberals & Progressives Violence

There are only a few steps from the righteous rage of the Left and Mr. Duke.

Rude and Barbaric

Posted on December 15, 2010 in Culture Wars Hatred Propaganda

square687Many of us are paralyzed into non-thinking when someone invokes “freedom of speech” or “freedom of religion” as the reason why they believe as they do. When you translate this, it means “I can say what I want and you can’t criticize it.” It’s a common rejoinder from the Right — especially racists — and from extremist believers aka Fundamentalists among Christians, Jews, and Muslims. When the American public buys into this, it leads us to a place where only the corrupt and vile can speak.

The First Amendment was never meant to operate so. And I think free speech is closer to what Dietrich Bonhoeffer said about ethics: ethics aren’t there to excuse what we do but to make us reach for something better. When we let the racist or the fundamentalist go unchallenged because “it’s his opinion and he can think what he wants” we let society down. We allow it to fester in fraudulency and evil. It is our duty to say to people who voice ugliness that they are ugly. We have these rights to make a better America, a better world. And part of that means using our voices to confront wrong.

If a Muslim cleric says apostates must be executed, we have a right to say “Well, that is just barbaric.” If a skinhead says he has a right to hate foreigners, we have a right to say “That is backwards and bad.” They scream that it is their free speech right, but they cannot silence us with their insistences that they can say anything — and do anything — they want without us challenging them because of free speech. That alone deserves admonishment. They live in America and they cannot put a stopper on their fellow citizens.

They are rude and barbaric. And I think they realize it, but don’t want to admit it.

Top

Obama’s Blunder

Posted on December 7, 2010 in Accountability Campaign 2010 Class

My only question is “Jerry Brown? Won’t you run?

Top

Twain, Gould, and Mammonism; Strickland

Posted on December 2, 2010 in Accountability Class Reading

square685I’m deep in Mark Twain’s Autobiography, a curious document which consists of his dictated remembrances, newspaper clippings, and a biography written by his second child, Susy. It does not follow any sort of neat line, but jumps about like a carnival ride landing here in his lecture circuit days, there in his boyhood, and here in his opinions of the current day. One passage that I have just read speaks to our time:

Jay Gould had just then reversed the commercial morals of the United States. He put a blight upon them from which they have never recovered, and from which they will not recover for as much as a century to come. Jay Gould was the mightiest disaster which has ever befallen this country. The people had desired money before his day, but he taught them to fall down and worship it. They had respected men of means before his day, but along with this respect was joined the respect due to the character and industry which had accumulated it. But Jay Gould taught the entire nation to make a god of money and the man, no matter how the money might have been acquired. In my youth there was nothing resembling a worship of money or of its possessor, in our region. And in our region no well-to-do man was ever charged with having acquired his money by shady methods.

The gospel left behind by Jay Gould is doing giant work in our days. Its message is “Get money. Get it quickly. Get it in abundance. Get it in prodigious abundance. Get ir dishonestly if you can, honestly if you must.”

How true! A new American feudalism arises before our eyes and it has bought the traditional check against its progress, the media. Ted Strickland, who was recently narrowly defeated as Ohio’s governor, thinks part of the problem is that the Democrats have failed to speak about these conditions in language which voters understand.

Instead of embracing populism, they have retreated into intellectual elitism.

Strickland says:

“I think it has to do with a sort of intellectual elitism that considers that kind of talk is somehow lacking in sophistication. I’m not sure where it comes from. But I think it’s there. There’s an unwillingness to draw a line in the sand.”

This intellectual elitist concurs with Strickland’s assessment. As the governor asks “How many times do you have to be, you know, slapped in the face?”

It’s class warfare and my class needs better generals.

Top

The Fall of America

Posted on December 1, 2010 in Civic Responsibility Disasters

Mark me a true patriot.

Top

What Kind of Liberal Am I?

Posted on November 24, 2010 in Quizzes

Quiz: What Kind of Liberal Are You?

My Liberal Identity

You are a Reality-Based Intellectualist, also known as the liberal elite. You are a proud member of what’s known as the reality-based community, where science, reason, and non-Jesus-based thought reign supreme.

Take the quiz at
About.com Political Humor

Top

Dream

Posted on November 13, 2010 in Dreams

My wife and I have gone back to school and become attorneys.

Top

The Death of the Internet

Posted on November 4, 2010 in Net Neutrality

square682The Constitution promises us that Congress shall make no law restricting freedom of speech. But there is a loophole: private corporations can. And now with the loss of the election, it is likely that Net Neutrality will fail and we will lose the Internet as we know it.

It’s simple: the corporations can curb freedom of speech by owning the stump. By owning the stump, they can say who gets to stand on it. Your and my voice will be silenced if we don’t say what they like hearing. It will be the death of the Internet.

As a disabled American, I am now sentenced to loneliness.

It was good while it lasted.

Top

Return of the Wimpocrats

Posted on November 3, 2010 in Campaign 2010

square681I think Rachel Maddow said it best: Democrats, if you don’t campaign on your accomplishments, the Republicans will. Once again, however, the Wimpocrats appeared and acted as if all they had done was something to be ashamed of. And that lost them the House.

Here are the elements that did the Democrats in this time:

  • They pissed on the progressives. Get it through your head, Democrats, you don’t win elections without the progressives. If they don’t like you, you lose the people who will go door to door for you and make calls. Register the case of Blanche Lincoln who would not give an inch on health care. Even when progressive leaders made up, she still would not give ground and she lost. Those who had the love of progressives won.
  • Rahm Emmanuel. Good riddance. Obama and Congress LOWERED taxes, but somehow this information wasn’t getting out. Instead, everyone just wonked into the Oval Office and said nothing in their own defense. When you say nothing, the word doesn’t get out.
  • Tim Kaine. We need another Howard Dean in this role.
  • Harry Reid. He couldn’t keep his party in line and badly misread Joe Lieberman. Harry, please step down.
  • As suggested by the first paragraph, the Democrats utterly failed to take credit for the good they had done.
  • They ran scared of corporate America. They figured that there was nothing to be done about scare ads and big money. Yet here in California, Jerry Brown shellacked Meg Whitman by running a campaign that promised to put corporations in line. Maybe we understand these things better than they do elsewhere having endured the disaster that was AHnold, but the rest were utterly silent on the matter. Brown’s campaign needs to be studied and emulated elsewhere.

The Democrats got to stop being the Chicago Cubs.

Progressives, we will be back. I just hope to live to see it.

Top

Notes on the California State DBSA Conference

Posted on October 25, 2010 in DBSA Support Groups and Conferences

square680Conferences bring together a variety of speakers and audiences. Numbers at this year’s California State Conference in Ontario, California, had suffered a bit from the economy, but audience involvement with the speakers was more intense than in past years or maybe I felt it more because I had recruited some of the speakers.

The strongest and most original clarion call was issued by the therapist Dr. Mary Madrigal. I recruited her to speak to remind us of those in their last days and their possibilities for comfort or abandonment. Death comes to us all. The question is what will be the quality of the time on the death bed? Will we be surrounded by caring staff or will we be left alone in a room because that same staff shrinks from us because we suffer from mental illness?

The hockey mask of Jason affects the opinions of medical professionals who supposedly have been educated in the realities of our illnesses. “Caregivers often express fear of those with mental disorders,” says Dr. Madrigal, “while dealing routinely with victims of dementia.” Statistics show that most of us are harmless, yet we may find ourselves shoved to the further reaches of the hospice where our cries of fear cannot be heard.

Dr. Madrigal told us that we will fight “not only the nearness of death, but also the judgments made against the mentally ill.” This is no way to pass on. Doctors, nurses, chaplains, and other hospice workers need to be educated on our needs. Peer specialists could make a specialty of caring for the dying and their families. The time is now to reach out for better final care for people like us,

She left us with a question to ask about our peers living their last days: “How are we going to honor their lives?”


During Friday night’s entertainment, we witnessed former DBSA director’s Peter Ashenden’s tirade against Dr. David Miklowitz due to the fact that the latter had referred to “bipolar persons” rather than “people living with bipolar disorder”. This kind of controversy reminds me of the “big enders” versus “small enders” opposition in the parliament of Lilliput. Ashenden’s focusing on terminology helped obfuscate the many positive elements of Miklowitz’s speech including the doctor’s insistence that we avoid the temptation to just take a pill and be done with it as far as healing goes. Mikowitz also emphasized the importance of personalizing information given to patients about their disorder, to allow patients to design mood charts that worked for them, and to encourage family members to get therapy themselves. All these points and more (see Lynn’s article) were lost by Ashenden when he dissed Dr. Miklowitz for the use of the term “bipolar patient”. “Don’t put a label on me!” cried Ashenden. And so he brought back a memory….

Twenty five years ago, a woman I was hanging around with at what time exploded with words like this: “I hate judgmental people. They make the world so much worse. It would be so much better if we didn’t have so many judgmental people around.” I had to restrain my laughter. Did she not see the degree to which she was the judgmental one? When faulty, judgment reduces and ejects everything except the pretense of one defining quality. Did Ashenden stop to think about his extreme judgmental evaluation of Miklowitz, one that reduced a compassionate talk to one phrase that the former head of DBSA thought was going to get us all locked up by an evil establishment?


Abuse precipitates many bipolar episodes, Dr. Miklowitz noted. Mood swings make it impossible to treat Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. There is a need to medicate and to offer therapy. I have to say that I agree with this assessment. I had considerable trouble facing my PTSD before I was put on lithium. Even now, I have problems.

There is a more extreme view that gained some voice at the conference. That was that our symptoms are entirely the result of trauma and that the medical establishment would rather sedate our symptoms into nonexistence than admit to their origins.

Dr. Rosenfeld was besieged during his talk by people who were eager for non-drug solutions such as Trans-Cranial Magnetic Stimulation. Rosenfeld reported an 80% success rate with the procedure, a fact that gave many in his audience hope for the future. Among them were people who had been through multiple ECT treatments with poor results. TMS could reverse those failures. While many will be helped by this, drug therapy will remain part of the equation for depression.

Meds have clearly helped me, but I have my nights when I am haunted by demons of my past or my disappointment in my lack of achievements. Therapists will often avoid talking about these things lest they precipitate an episode. The people who see it only as trauma-related suggest that I haven’t been put through enough pain. I see this as an alternative stigma, one that suggests that I am going through what I am going through because of character flaws. Both mainstream psychiatry and alternative approaches have driven me to a place where I feel to blame for my history. But they both have something to offer me, as well.


Top

When Our Morals Began to Fail

Posted on September 27, 2010 in History War

Do you not see the harbinger of the nonexistent weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and the concentration camps that Obama is supposedly building to house his political enemies?

Top
  • Recent Comments

  • Categories

  • Archives