Posted on October 21, 2007 in Dreams
We have three monkeys (that look like three-toed sloths) and they are out in the backyard of my childhood home.
Posted on October 21, 2007 in Psych Wards Stigma
Gareth and I both suffer from bipolar disorder. And the two of us are concerned about the present state of the mental health system from the point of view of people who do not like coercion other than the natural coercion of suffering. Gareth feels that “unwanted, involuntary psychiatric hospitalization really is experienced as being just the same as jail.” I’m a little more open to its use, but in cases when the safety of the person is threatened or the safety of those around them is threatened.
But I think you have to make a pretty good case for it, namely that there is a knife or a gun in the person’s hands or that the person has physically attacked other people. In other words, the person has to be doing more than waving her or his hands wildly or expressing profanity.
I think there is something to this:
I’m talking to people who choose or have chosen to be homeless or psychotic or both, who say they know exactly what they are choosing and it is the situation they prefer (less stressful, familiar, feels better than other ways they have tried).
We should all be able to relate to knowingly taking risks in life. The more freedom, the more risk you can take on. We drive on the freeway. Some people choose to be fire fighters or fighter pilots or sports players or police officers. Some people do really choose to be homeless knowing they could be raped or murdered. Some people also choose to move to neighborhoods full of homeless people and be “urban pioneers.”
Frankly, I think an Atlanta police officer is one of the very last people who should be telling me I should not be free to do things that could get me killed!
It’s no accident that our Vietnam veterans are often among those most comfortable on the streets or at the margins.
Of course the question Gareth needs to answer is “if these people are mentally ill, how can we trust their choices?”
Setting this as a standard, we can’t. But neither can we trust the choice of any of these to seek therapy on their own or to begin taking medication. The country of trust becomes very small when we follow these definitions and the country of distrust a continent. You hear it from both sides. There are those who want to lock every single mentally ill person up and those who want to keep their loved ones out of the hospital lest they become dependent on the State or a bad reflection on their families. The tyrannies facing us come from all quarters and, sometimes, from people who have attached themselves to the patients’ rights movement for reasons that confound recovery.
There’s another point on view, the “non-medical model” that insists that “nearly” all mental illness* is the product of past trauma. Some patient-rights advocates, drunk on the juice of [[Thomas Szasz]], feel that the State should abandon the successful chemical imbalance model altogether. (I think there is evidence to suggest that they’ve never seriously implemented it.) These feel that the issue is trauma. Much of their zealotry is based, probably, on bad experiences with hospitals that take away all your rights the moment they confiscate your shoelaces, that shoot you up with [[Thorazine]], and warehouse you.
You see, many state hospitals have not caught up with the early Twenty-First century, seeing their job as merely keeping patients off the streets.
I’ve been fortunate in that my hospital experience was not like that, but then I went to the best “behavioral health unit” my insurance would pay for, where they combined reasonable doses of medication with talk-therapy. The psychiatrist I visit appreciates that I need both medical and psychological support for my recovery. I’m told that this is rare, but from the experience that I glean from others the problem seems to be the patient choosing one over the other or just not listening to what the psychiatrist or counselor is telling them.
It sucks to suffer. And I relate to those who flail about distrusting the establishment because the world already feels like a cage. Who wants to become a tame animal, collar around his neck after all? I’ve lived on the edge of the abyss, peering down like a gargoyle afraid of his shadow and of the shadow of the planet. More than once I have traced shallow cuts across my skin in suicidal play and once I came close to doing the real thing. I have been haunted by hallucinations of knives that I could not talk into leaving. Years of talk therapy alone and years of medication alone never gave me the stability I needed to live like a man. It’s been the combination that has helped me through the times and raised me to a place of self-satisfaction and reliance.
I have not been shoved into an institution (I chose it myself) but others have, often by panicky families and public officials, people who operated on the basis of the stigma. Bipolar disorder exists, but it is not an excuse for denying any person her or his civil rights. As for the sane, there must be crimes committed before a person can involuntarily lose freedom. Sometimes, I dare say, this must be done. And when it must be done, it should but with choice preserved even in jails. As it is elsewhere in our democratic society, it is through choice that we shed our stone wings and fly steadily.
*A contemporary two-step used by stealth Szaszians. The implication here is that the meds are always for some person other than the person who doesn’t want to be on meds.
Posted on October 20, 2007 in Anxiety
Oh the bad old days, the bad old days, when the emphasis was on the ability to jump rope or put a basketball through a hoop rather than on your intellect. Has anyone ever told you that they didn’t happen or, more likely, that they shouldn’t have affected you? A new study out of Canada has something to say on the matter:
In a study published in The Journal of Sport Behavior, researchers at the University of Alberta in Edmonton examined the relationships among perceived athletic competence, peer acceptance and loneliness in elementary school children. Their findings will likely confirm the experience of anyone who was picked last for the team in gym class: children seen as athletic by their classmates are also better liked and less likely to feel lonely, while unathletic children experience the opposite.
“For both boys and girls, we found that popular children reported less loneliness and received higher athletic ability ratings from their peers than rejected children,” says lead researcher Janice Causgrove Dunn, from the Faculty of Physical & Recreation at the University of Alberta. “Conversely, the kids who reported higher levels of loneliness tended to receive lower athletic ability ratings and lower social acceptance ratings from their peers.”
Past studies have found that loneliness in childhood and adolescence is associated with many psychosocial and emotional problems, and prolonged loneliness has the potential to seriously undermine an individual’s psychological, emotional and physical well-being. Lonely children are often less physically active and less fit, and more likely to experience tension and anxiety than their non-lonely counterparts. In adolescence and early adulthood, loneliness has been linked to behaviors including cigarette smoking, marijuana use and alcoholism, as well as an increased risk of school drop out and depression.
“Given the proven negative impact of loneliness on a child’s well being, this kind of research is an important endeavor,” says Causgrove Dunn. “It’s important to identify and understand the factors that might increase a child’s likelihood of being accepted by the peer group, because this, in turn, decreases the likelihood of that child experiencing the destructive psychosocial and emotional problems that often come with rejection.”
And what do we expect the reaction from parents and teachers to be? Kids are mean. In other words, no action whatsoever.
Normalness includes a streak of cruelty, we often hear. Give it time before [[Steve Pinker]] or another of his kind comes up with a genetic study showing that this comes out of a natural pack psychosis, the implication being that those who do it cannot help themselves.
I not only caught it from the kids at school (I had asthma in smoggy Southern California), but my darling older brother poured it on, using his new-found vocabulary to call me a “lummox”. When I complained, I was told that I was supposed to “learn to take it”. But the people who put me through this didn’t go through this like I did. If you suffer from any kind of mental illness, I am sure you know the feeling: whatever your experience you receive the whimpy excuse that “you’re not the only one with problems”. Yes, we all know that having a stubbed toe is equivalent to losing a limb. In this case, they are actually watching the bullies sawing the leg off as they tell you to buck up and be brave.
[tags]bullying, bullies, anxiety, rejection, sports[/tags]
Posted on October 19, 2007 in Reading
“What a thing it is to have a country that can’t be wrong, but if it is, is right, anyway!”
– William Dean Howells
Posted on October 18, 2007 in Humor?
So little time, so much to fabricate
Jeremy Hilary Boob (unattributed)
You will, of course, doubt these. But my last set of “Nowhere Facts” did cause a few eyebrows to tilt, so I had to do it again.
From Nowhere Land, goodbye!
Posted on October 17, 2007 in Psychotropics Uncertainty
A brief article at John Gale’s Mental Health Update notes that older psychiatric patients are more likely to take their meds than younger ones:
A study of 32,991 people in the U.S. compared adherence to antipsychotic medication in older (over 60) and younger patients with bipolar disorder. The researchers found that among the older group 61% were fully adherent, 19% were partially adherent and 20% were non-adherent compared to 49.5%, 21.8% and 28.7% respectively for the younger patients.
One wonders about the possible reasons for this trend.
Articles like this remain in the back of my mind as I read accounts of people in episode who won’t take meds (yes, there are more than one going through this right now) around the blogging world. There’s not much you can do when someone doesn’t want to do the drugs: it’s more important to reduce your own stressors and keep to your own program. (Oh God. I’m sounding like a Toastmaster!) While I do not know the full circumstances of each and every person going through the combined traumas of memory and chemical imbalance, I do know that years of talk therapy did not help me. Going it alone isolated me, worsened my condition. The thing that eased the pain in the end was allowing a psychiatrist to work with me, to develop a chemical and psychotherapeutic answer.
But I feel sad, very sad, when I see people in obvious torment, screaming about conspiracies against them or about their suspicions of psychiatrists. Each has her or his own cheering section of supporters who will tell them that they are doing the right thing. I can do nothing for them. My hands are full. My own life needs saving from the disease and from the world.
Posted on October 17, 2007 in California Watch Scoundrels The Orange
[[O.J. Simpson|O.J. Simpson’s]] name appeared — along with [[Dionne Warwick]] and Sinbad (wtfih?) — on a list of California’s top tax cheats. But let’s not keep it to tabloid stars. It is fit and becoming to identify my fellow Orange County residents who made the anti-pantheon:
O.J. totted up $1,435,484.17 in unpaid personal income taxes. I guess this makes him into a hero of many of those who villified him, namely those who want less government on your backs and more prosecutions.
Posted on October 17, 2007 in Morals & Ethics Peace
Let’s be real: the reason why Bush gave the Congressional Gold Medal to the Dalai Lama is that he knew the world would be flooded with the news of [[Al Gore]] winning the [[Nobel Peace Prize]]. Bush knows that there is no way in hell — aside from the invasion of Norway — that he will ever win any legitimate peace prize so he hopes that some of the Dalai Lama’s cachet will rub off on him in a difficult time.
The [[Dalai Lama]] kept to rather neutral remarks, of course. He did not attack the Bush regime’s war in Iraq for example, but concentrated his concerns on China which has occupied [[Tibet]] since 1952. His desire to make a stand for his people may have interfered with his perceived status as the international voice for Buddhists. (We should remember that his authority is no more universal than the Pope’s.) But then Buddhism — like primitive Christianity — is an existential religion: you alone are responsible for your salvation and peace of mind.
Bush’s prayer wheel must be spinning wildly now as he watches his place in history grow darker. In a generation or so, someone will write a vindication of this scoundrel administration, but what is more likely is placement in the pantheon of American villains, particularly as historians reexamine the 2000 and 2004 elections.
I am disappointed that the Dalai Lama allowed himself to become a tool for this man for no better reason than to gain a platform for Tibetan autonomy. I am disappointed that this award was not given out by Speaker of the House [[Nancy Pelosi]] because, after all, this is the Congressional Gold Medal and not the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Dubya had no place on that grandstand. The show belonged to someone else.
[tags]Buddhism, Dalai Lama, peace prize, awards, Tibet[/tags]
Posted on October 16, 2007 in Campaign 2008
Republican members of Congress are leaving in droves and the Grand Old Putridity is having trouble raising money, too! Representative [[Ray LaHood]], for one, kvetched to the Los Angeles Times: “I don’t like being in the minority,” he said. “It’s not that much fun, and the prospects for the future don’t look that good.” Glad to hear that.
Posted on October 16, 2007 in Crosstalk Mania
Here’s a charming piece from McMan’s Depression and Bipolar Web about the real character of bipolar disorder:
The last roller coaster ride I was on, in fact every roller coaster ride I’ve been on, and there have been plenty, has been a blast! Clackety- clack on the big old fashioned wooden ones, round and round on loops, up the hills, down into the troughs with your stomach 100 yards behind you, through Space Mountain with R2D2 and C3PO, the whoosh of cool air and mechanical noises, up the Matterhorn in toboggans run by helpful lederhosened Disney employees, past the Yeti, round the bend where centrifugal force keeps you in the sled, then another whoosh! Down the mountain, through the water, and out. OUT. Controlled, hysterical fun, and then OUT.
Let’s look at it this way: If manic depressive illness were like a roller coaster ride, there would be people lined up around the block for it. They would spend a fortune trying to get it, rather than trying to get rid of it, and there would be an adorable kiosk on the corner selling ice cream and souvenirs rather than a pharmacy selling lithium. Manic depression being likened to a ride on a roller coaster is about as accurate as a heart attack being compared to heartburn.
I wonder to what degree has our perception/memory of our mania’s have been influenced by the common folk description. Many people have told me “oh I know how it must feel. It’s really good when you’re in mania, right?” No, it sucks in mania just as it does in depression but for different reasons. My mouth is flapping at a mile a minute, my body is shaking, and my temper is gunpowder spread on the floor of a smoking car of a railroad. I don’t like being manic because I know I will crash, repeatedly. The only thing to do is to hide in my room so that I don’t make a fool of myself, to pull all my energy together and act like a six foot four mouse who only squeaks in response to questions because he doesn’t want to appear insane.
Maybe some people feel the whoosh, but I am not one of them. As for the supposed crash of depression, I wouldn’t describe it as that at all. You just find yourself in it. It’s more like closing the blinds on acid-bright sunshine. You feel like your head has turned to jelly and it’s sticking and dragging on the floor.
The disease ain’t no theme park. It really is a sickness.
Posted on October 16, 2007 in Journalists & Pundits Occupation of Iraq Scoundrels
I’m stealing Kathryn Cramer’s usual thunder here by posting about the Blackwater Scandal:
The Blackwater scandal has gotten plenty of media coverage, and it deserves a lot more. Taxpayer subsidies for private mercenaries are antithetical to democracy, and Blackwater’s actions in Iraq have often been murderous. But the scandal is unfolding in a U.S. media context that routinely turns criticisms of the war into demands for a better war.
Many politicians are aiding this alchemy. Rhetoric from a House committee early this month audibly yearned for a better war at a highly publicized hearing that featured [[Erik Prince]], the odious CEO of [[Blackwater USA]].
A congressman from New Hampshire, [[Paul Hodes]], insisted on the importance of knowing “whether failures to hold Blackwater personnel accountable for misconduct undermine our efforts in Iraq.” Another Democrat on the panel, [[Carolyn Maloney]] of New York, told Blackwater’s top exec that “your actions may be undermining our mission in Iraq and really hurting the relationship and trust between the Iraqi people and the American military.”
But the problem with Blackwater’s activities is not that they “undermine” the U.S. military’s “efforts” and “mission” in Iraq. The efforts and the mission shouldn’t exist.
As Ronald Reagan put it, there they go again. We elect them in 2006 by a landslide because we’re sick and tired of a war that even the bellicose [[Zbigniew Brzezinski]] found doomed to failure. They turn around and become the biggest fans of the war. I saw this happen when the war broke out. I had arguments about it. People decided that although they believed that the war was a crock that they had to make a public display of supporting it so that they would not be accused of not being patriots. Out came the flags and the assurances that they would be behind the unelected Bush Adminstration. And now, when the war has not only been shown to be a crock but an utter disaster, some Democrats and most journalists continue to find the silver lining in the sooty cloud.
[[Norman Solomon]] says it best:
Terrible as Blackwater has been and continues to be, that profiteering corporation should not be made a lightning rod for opposition to the war. New legislation that demands accountability from private security forces can’t make a war that’s wrong any more right. Finding better poster boys who can be touted as humanitarians rather than mercenaries won’t change the basic roles of gun-toting Americans in a country that they have no right to occupy.
The mantra to govern the next Democratic campaign should be: It’s the war, Stupid.